Case study - ScottishWill: automation around a controlled legal process
ScottishWill uses a guided customer journey, deterministic document logic and carefully controlled automations to run the operational work around online will writing. No large language model touches the legal document. The system gathers what is needed, moves each case through the right checks and leaves legal judgment and final review with a person.
01
The old problem was not a lack of information.
Many people know they should make a will but still do not get round to it. Access can feel awkward, the subject is easy to avoid and the conventional process asks people to arrange an appointment for something they would rather handle privately.
ScottishWill was built to bring that process into the customer's home without weakening the controls around the document. That meant solving two different jobs: make it easier for a customer to provide the right information, then remove the repetitive administration that makes an accessible service expensive to deliver.
02
The operating system.
| Stage | What the system does | Human control |
|---|---|---|
| Guided intake | Collects the facts and wishes needed for the selected service | Complex or unclear circumstances are surfaced |
| Document production | Applies fixed, deterministic document logic | No LLM is allowed to create or alter the legal document |
| Case movement | Files information, updates status and moves the case through the workflow | Exceptions remain visible for review |
| Completeness | Checks that required inputs and outputs are present | A person resolves ambiguity rather than the system guessing |
| Fulfilment | Prepares the approved case for delivery | Final review stays human |
This division matters. AI and automation are useful around classification, movement, reminders and operational consistency. A legal document needs deterministic logic and professional oversight. The architecture reflects that boundary instead of hiding it behind an "AI-powered" label.
03
What changed.
The automation lets one person carry the administration that would otherwise need four. That is the approved operational proof. We do not publish unsupported turnaround, revenue or customer-volume figures.
The broader result is viability. The process removes enough manual load to make a high-end product available at a reasonable price. Without those processes and the pricing they make possible, the business would not be viable.
Testimonial pending approval. No customer quote has been invented for this case study.
04
What this proves for another professional service.
The reusable lesson is not "automate legal work". It is to separate controlled outputs from the administration around them. Professional firms can automate intake, file handling, status updates, reminders and exception routing while keeping advice, approval and accountability with qualified people.
That pattern is central to managed operations, AI employees and our work with professional-services firms. Return to the proof hub for HALO and PCMG Property.
Tell us about your business
Tell us what keeps landing back on your desk. We’ll look at how the work really moves, where it gets stuck, and which part is worth fixing first.
The AI Ops Review is £750. It gives you a written plan, a clear order of attack, and an honest view of what should stay human.
No prep. No data handover. Start with the problem, not the software.